AI you can put your name on.

Those are general assistants. They’ll answer anything, sound equally confident whether they’re right or guessing, and leave you no trail. Lejjors is built for one job: preparing accounting work you’re going to sign. Every figure it uses links back to the document it came from, anything it can’t confirm gets flagged rather than smoothed over, and the whole file is logged so a reviewer can follow the reasoning. A screenshot of a chat window isn’t evidence.

Use it — for the books it’s genuinely good, and Lejjors sits beside it rather than replacing it. What it doesn’t do is your year-end file. It won’t assemble a Notice to Reader compilation, trace every figure on a working paper back to source, or hand you a file you can review and sign. That’s where Lejjors starts.

Honestly: on mechanical checks — casts, cross-casts, prior-year continuity, reconciliations, missing support — it is more consistent than a tired human at eleven at night, because it never skims. On judgment — materiality, unusual transactions, whether something feels wrong — it is not a substitute for you, and it is built not to pretend otherwise. That’s why it flags rather than decides. The honest way to find out is to run it on a file you already know the answers to.

This is the question we hear most, and the honest answer is that the profession is still settling it. What’s already clear: the work is yours and the responsibility stays with you regardless of the tools, the same as any other software in your practice. Insurers and standard-setters are increasingly pointing firms toward an AI-use clause in the engagement letter as the clean way to handle it. We can share the language other firms are using. What we won’t do is tell you it’s a non-issue.

No. Start alongside what you already use. There’s no migration, nothing to rip out, and no requirement to move your existing files. Most firms begin with a single quality check on one file, keep every other part of their process exactly as it is, and only add a desk when the last one has earned it. If it ever stops being useful, you export everything and walk.

Your file is yours. It’s encrypted in transit and at rest, access-controlled, and never used to train models. You can export the whole engagement — the signed file plus the underlying numbers in a format you can actually open — and leave whenever you want. No hostage architecture. SOC 2 and formal certifications are on the roadmap, not claimed today.